Jamer

Registered DJ just waiting for confirmation email :Winky:

Clear Legal Guidelines For Parents Wanting To Photograph Or Film Their Kids At School Events Responsible department: Department for Education I would like the government to give clear guidleines in the form of leaflets etc for schools on the guidelines and laws concerning parents being able to photograph or film their kids at schools events, such as school plays, concerts, sports days etc... I am fed up with being told that I cannot photograph my kids! even though there is no law preventing this, we live in a paranoid World, unfortunately my family album will have massive gaps in it from my children's school days. "Stand ready to challenge any schools or councils that say 'bah, humbug' to a bit of festive fun." I didn't write the above headline, it was said by the UK government's Information Commissioner, Christopher Graham.The full quote is: ""Armed with our guidance, parents should feel free to snap away this Christmas and stand ready to challenge any schools or councils that say 'bah, humbug' to a bit of festive fun." I want the government to produce notices explaining that it is okay to photograph your kids! https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/15364/signature/new

Hello Spidey!! how you doing mate? good to see you here :Smiler:

So they can keep his DNA even though he has not been charged?

The CPS have said today that no charges against the man who stabbed the intruder. Result!

Trust me he is around as I only spoke to him last week. Email him or drop him a pm.

You could always ask PaulB...

There is a lot that I know, lets just say that my father worked with him, if you know what I mean, and I trained with R Squadron back in 1990/91 but not going to get into it on here though, but trust me on this one.

John's Funeral tomorrow. As for the above article, it's a loads of bollocks!

Sorry, but if I was disturbed by a burgler in my own house, he would have it! no messing around, especially if my kids were here, then it would be even worse for them! simple as that.

A man stabs an intruder who breaks into his home and is arrested, suspected of murder? WTF? surely he should be given an award not arrested! World has gone mad! http://www.bbc.co.uk...hester-14963811

Have a great time guy's! and post some pictures for us

Ticket price in my experience

Nothing like being a little negative... Well I have to say that I deal with customers all day long and we have never been so busy, I think people can talk themselves into a resession! besides people have to eat, so If you serious, I would start negotiations with the current owners and ask to see the books for the past 3 years, this will give you some idea.

I know his family, very sad, he never really got over his son being killed in Afghanistan. RIP Johnnymac

Well any business is potentially a good business as long as it is in the right area and has a good reputation. You may need a deposit, speak to the bank etc...

Then I think you will find that it will be a business loan, however, get the place properly valued as you still may be able to buy as a normal mortgage, which at the moment would be cheaper.

I would imagine it would be just a mortgage on the property. Are they asking a realised price for the property or have they added value to it because of the business? if they have added value then it may require a business loan. Secondly, I would think that the current owners would stay on with you for at least a month to show you how the business has been run, you could ask them that question.

sparks asked me about the change in linking using this new forum upgrade. It has changed, before you used to type in the url and then in another box you would type in the text or title. It has taken me a while to work it out but basically just type in the text or title you want the url to say then select it and hit the hyperlink button, then type in or paste the web address, it does work. I actually preferred the old method but this does work, thought I would explain. JamersPad Here

Facebook changes privacy options Facebook users will be asked to approve any postings that they are tagged in Continue reading the main story Related Stories Germans question tagging privacy Google unveils new Facebook rival Facebook sorry over tags launch Facebook has announced a major revamp of how users control their privacy on the site. Among the changes, items posted online will each have their own sharing settings determining who can see them. It is the latest in a long line of attempts by Facebook to streamline how members manage their personal information. In the past, the social network has been criticised for seeming to bury privacy settings in obscure menus. Postings will have their own unique privacy settings Now when users are tagged in a posting - such as a photograph or video - they will have the option to confirm or remove their identity before it appears on their profile. It is hoped the safeguard will eliminate the problem of malicious tagging, which is often used by cyberbullies who add other people's names to unpleasant images. Other changes include: In line controls - each item on a user's wall has individual privacy options, such as public, friends and custom Tag takedown - the ability to remove tags of self, ask the person who tagged you to remove it, or block the tagger Universal tagging - users can tag anyone, not just Facebook friends. Other person can choose not to accept the tagged post on their profile Location tagging - geographic locations can be added in all versions of Facebook, not just mobile app Profile view - the option to see how others view your profile is added above the news feed Facebook's vice president of product, Chris Cox said that the arrival of another privacy refresh didn't necessarily mean the old system was confusing. "I don't think the old controls were bad. I just think the new ones are much better," he told BBC News. "The goal is just to make [the settings] more inline and more immediate, just right there in the profile." Users can ask for tags of them to be removed or have the content deleted completely Mr Cox also played down suggestions that Facebook might be improving its privacy controls as it prepares to extend access to children under 13 - something its founder Mark Zuckerberg has said he would like to see. "This change is really just about the people that are on Facebook today and the new users who just joined today and making it easier for them. "This really is not in any way about the under-13 experience," said Mr Cox. He promised there would not be any unexpected changes to users' privacy settings during the changeover process. Existing users will retain their current default sharing settings. The first time new Facebook members share a piece of content, their default suggestion will be public - which replaces the "everyone" setting. If users select another option, that will become their default in future. The new privacy options will begin to be rolled out across the site from Thursday 25 August.

Yes I have thoughts like that mate, not nice

Ah see you learn something everyday, cheers DJ

I thought it was down the the individual, whether they display their details o not, I chose not to display mine.

Try http://www.iconarchive.com/

Excellent :Smiler: